Basics. Reporting with Passives
Reporting with Passives
When we want to distance ourselves from a statement or report general beliefs, news, and rumors, we often use passive reporting structures. You can use an impersonal structure starting with "it" (It is reported that the aliens will arrive) or a personal subject followed by a passive reporting verb and an infinitive (The aliens are expected to arrive).
This advanced challenge will test your ability to construct these complex sentences correctly. You will practice choosing between "it is" clauses and personal subjects, and you'll need to select the correct infinitive form to accurately match the timeline of the reported action. The scenarios cover eccentric billionaires, historical felines, and jewel thieves, requiring you to master perfect infinitives (to have invented), perfect continuous infinitives (to have been working), negative perfects (not to have cooked), and even passive infinitives (to have been buried).
You'll work through 12 questions in a fun mix of single-choice, multi-choice, drop-down, and drag-and-drop formats.
Try the quiz to check your knowledge!
Clause
Clause vs phrase: a clause has a subject + verb (she runs); a phrase does not (in the morning, running fast). This is the first distinction to make when analysing sentence structure.
A clause is a grammatical unit built around a verb: independent clauses make complete sentences; dependent clauses attach to them as modifiers or complements.
Diagnostic: find the verb. If there's a subject doing or being something → clause. If there's no subject-verb pair → phrase.
Future tense
Will vs going to: the most confused future pair. Will = spontaneous decisions and predictions (I'll have the fish; It will rain). Going to = pre-existing plans and evidence-based predictions (I'm going to study law; Look at those clouds — it's going to rain). Swap them and you sound either impulsive or weirdly formal.
English encodes future time through will, be going to, present continuous (arrangements), and present simple (schedules) — each with different implications.
Diagnostic: is the decision happening right now? → will. Was it already planned? → going to. Is it a confirmed arrangement with another person? → present continuous.
Indirect speech
Direct vs indirect speech: direct speech quotes exact words (She said, "I am tired."). Indirect speech reports the meaning (She said she was tired.). The key difference is backshift — tenses move one step into the past when the reporting verb is past tense.
Indirect speech = reported words without quotation marks. Core mechanism: backshift (present→past, past→past perfect, will→would) + pronoun/time shifts.
Diagnostic: is the reporting verb past (said, told)? → backshift required. Is it present (says, tells)? → no shift needed. Exception: universal truths don't shift (He said the Earth is round).
Infinitive
Infinitive vs gerund: the #1 verb-pattern confusion. Some verbs take only infinitive (want to go ✅), some only gerund (enjoy going ✅), some both with different meanings (stop to smoke ≠ stop smoking). No logical rule exists — learn by verb.
The infinitive = base verb form used non-finitely. To-infinitive (to go) after certain verbs. Bare infinitive (go) after modals and causatives.
Diagnostic: what's the main verb? Check whether it takes to-infinitive, bare infinitive, or gerund. If unsure, try both and see which sounds natural to native speakers.
Negation
Single vs double negatives: standard English uses ONE negative per clause (I don't see anything or I see nothing). Double negatives (I don't see nothing) are grammatical in many languages and some English dialects, but are non-standard in written/formal English. This is the #1 negation trap for speakers of Spanish, Russian, and French.
Negation = not after auxiliary/modal, or do-support. Negative words (never, nobody, nothing) negate alone without adding not.
Diagnostic: count the negatives in the clause. More than one? → double negative. Fix by replacing one with a positive (anything, anyone, ever).
Pronoun
Pronoun vs noun: nouns name explicitly (Sarah, the book). Pronouns substitute and point back (she, it). Pronouns are a closed class (you can't invent new ones easily), while nouns are open (new ones appear constantly). The main complication: pronouns still carry case marking that nouns have lost.
A pronoun replaces a noun or noun phrase. Types: personal, demonstrative, relative, interrogative, reflexive, indefinite.
Diagnostic: every pronoun must have a clear antecedent (the noun it replaces). If the reader can't tell which noun a pronoun refers to → ambiguity error.
Subject
Subject vs object: the subject does or is; the object receives. She (subject) hit him (object). In English, position decides: subject comes before the verb, object after. Unlike inflected languages, English rarely marks subjects with case (exception: pronouns — I vs me).
The subject = who/what the sentence is about. Controls verb agreement. Usually a noun/pronoun before the verb.
Diagnostic: ask "who or what [verb]s?" The answer is the subject. The list of items is wrong — what is wrong? The list. That's your subject.
Verb
Verb vs noun vs adjective: nouns name things. Adjectives describe. Verbs express what happens or what IS. The test: can it take tense (walked, will walk)? Can it take -ing? Can it follow to as an infinitive (to walk)? Yes to any → verb. English often converts freely between classes (run = noun or verb), so context decides.
A verb = action/state/occurrence word. 5 forms (base, -s, past, past participle, -ing). Carries tense, aspect, mood, voice. The one required element in every sentence.
Diagnostic: does it change for tense (walk → walked)? Can you put to before it (to walk)? Does it take -ing (walking)? → verb.
Passive voice
Active vs passive: active puts the doer first (The dog bit the man). Passive puts the receiver first (The man was bitten by the dog). Neither is inherently wrong — choice depends on what you want to foreground. Scientific/formal writing uses passive deliberately; vague writing uses it accidentally.
Passive voice = be + past participle. Promotes the object to subject. Good for foregrounding the action/result; bad when it hides who's responsible.
Diagnostic: who's doing the action? If unnamed and that matters → bad passive. If unnamed because it's obvious or irrelevant (The building was constructed in 1920) → good passive.
Perfect tense
Present perfect vs simple past: I lost my keys (past: specific time, done). I have lost my keys (perfect: result matters NOW — I still don't have them). The perfect always connects past action to present relevance. If the time is specified (yesterday, in 2010) → simple past. If the result matters now → present perfect.
The perfect aspect = have + past participle. Marks completion relative to a time point. Three forms: present/past/future perfect.
Diagnostic: does the sentence mention a specific finished time (yesterday, last year, in 1999)? → simple past. Is it about the result/relevance NOW? → present perfect.
Progressive tense
Progressive vs simple: I work in London (permanent job) vs I am working in London (temporary assignment). Simple = fact/habit/permanent. Progressive = ongoing/temporary/in-progress. Same verb, different aspect, different meaning. The choice isn't about grammar preference — it changes what you're communicating.
The progressive = be + -ing. Marks ongoing/temporary actions. Stative verbs resist it.
Diagnostic: is the action happening RIGHT NOW and likely to stop? → progressive. Is it a general truth, habit, or scheduled event? → simple. Is the verb stative (know, own, believe)? → simple (even if happening now).
B2 | Upper Intermediate
B2 vs C1: B2 means effective communication on complex topics with some effort. C1 means effortless fluency with precise register control. If you can argue a point but still reach for words and make structural slips under pressure, you're B2.
B2 is the upper-intermediate CEFR level: mixed conditionals, complex passives, reported speech with backshift, participle clauses, and sustained written argument.
Diagnostic: does your writing read as "competent non-native" or "could be native"? The former → B2. The latter → C1.
Hard
Hard vs Medium: Medium tests one rule with realistic distractors. Hard tests interacting rules, edge cases, or context-dependent answers where multiple options seem correct until you think deeply. If you're scoring 80%+ on Medium, try Hard to find your real gaps.
The Hard tag filters for B2+ challenges with layered difficulty: rule interactions, subtle distractors, and contexts that demand genuine grammatical reasoning.
Diagnostic: if Hard questions feel impossible, drop to Medium and master the individual rules first. Hard assumes you already know each rule — it tests whether you can apply them together.