"are monitoring" is a correct option. This is the present continuous form of the verb "monitor", which is used to indicate that the action is currently taking place. "have been monitoring" is also correct. This is the present perfect continuous form of the verb "monitor", which is used to indicate that the action started in the past and continues to the present moment. "will monitor" is correct too as it expresses a promise. "would monitor" is incorrect. This is the conditional form of the verb "monitor", which is used to indicate a hypothetical or uncertain situation.
Present tense
- I work here. — simple present (habit/permanent)
- I am working now. — present progressive (happening right now)
- I have lived here for 10 years. — present perfect (started past, still true)
- I have been waiting for an hour. — present perfect progressive (duration up to now)
Four present tense forms: simple (habits/facts), progressive (now/temporary), perfect (past → present relevance), perfect progressive (ongoing duration). Each encodes a different relationship between the action and the present moment.
Trap: "I am living here for 10 years" ❌ — started in the past + still true = present PERFECT (have lived/have been living), not progressive.
Progressive tense
- ✅ I am working in London. — temporary, happening now
- ✅ I work in London. — permanent/habitual (simple)
- ❌ I am knowing the answer. — stative verb, can't be progressive
- ✅ She was reading when I arrived. — past progressive (in progress at that moment)
The progressive = be + -ing. Marks actions as ongoing, temporary, or in-progress at a reference time. NOT used with stative verbs (know, believe, own, want, like) unless meaning shifts.
Rule: is the action temporary/in-progress right now? → progressive. Is it a permanent fact, habit, or schedule? → simple. Is it a stative verb? → almost never progressive.
Simple tense
- ✅ I go to work every day. — present simple (habit)
- ✅ She went home yesterday. — past simple (completed action)
- ✅ I will call you later. — future simple (promise/decision)
- ✅ Water boils at 100°C. — present simple (general truth)
The simple aspect is the default, unmarked verb form. Present simple = habits, facts, schedules. Past simple = completed actions. Future simple = predictions, promises, decisions. No auxiliary needed (except will for future and do for questions/negatives).
Rule: if the action is a fact, habit, completed event, or scheduled future — and you don't need to emphasise it being in-progress or connected to now → simple tense.
Future tense
- ✅ I*'ll** help you.* — spontaneous decision (will)
- ✅ I*'m going to** study medicine.* — planned intention
- ✅ I*'m meeting** Sam at six.* — fixed arrangement (present continuous)
- ✅ The train leaves at 8. — scheduled event (present simple)
English has no single future tense — it uses will, be going to, present continuous, and present simple for different shades of future meaning. The choice signals whether you're predicting, planning, arranging, or stating a schedule.
Pattern: spontaneous → will. Planned → going to. Arranged → present continuous. Timetabled → present simple.
Perfect tense
- ✅ I have lived here for ten years. — present perfect (started past, still true)
- ❌ I live here for ten years. — wrong (simple present can't bridge past→now)
- ✅ She had finished before I arrived. — past perfect (earlier past)
- ✅ They will have left by noon. — future perfect (completed before future point)
The perfect = have + past participle. Connects an action to a reference point in time. Present perfect bridges past→now. Past perfect marks "earlier past." Future perfect marks "done before a future deadline."
Rule: if the action started in the past and is still relevant now → present perfect (have done). If two past events and you need the earlier one → past perfect (had done).
C2 | Proficiency
- ✅ His was a pyrrhic victory, if ever there was one. — literary allusion + inversion
- ✅ She'd have been none the wiser had he not let slip. — inverted conditional + idiom
- ✅ The proposal, laudable though it may be, fails on pragmatic grounds. — formal concession
- ✅ "Nice weather," he deadpanned, eyeing the hailstones. — irony + narrative register
These are C2 patterns — the highest CEFR level. At C2 you handle literary allusion, irony, any register, and complex written argument with native-like precision across all subjects.
Marker: if your English is indistinguishable from an educated native speaker's across registers, you're C2.
C1 | Advanced
- ✅ Not only did she finish early, but she also helped others. — inversion for emphasis
- ✅ It is the process that matters, not the result. — cleft sentence
- ✅ I insist that he be present. — formal subjunctive
- ✅ Were I to disagree, I would say so. — inverted conditional
These are C1 structures — the CEFR advanced level. At C1 you control inversion, cleft sentences, subjunctive forms, and register-switching fluently across formal and informal contexts.
Marker: if you can restructure a sentence for rhetorical effect without hesitation, you're C1.
Hard
- Had she not intervened, the situation would have escalated. — inverted conditional
- All distractors are grammatically plausible in other contexts
- Multiple rules interact (e.g., tense + aspect + modality)
- Context determines the answer — no single "rule" is enough
Hard marks upper-intermediate to advanced challenges: B2+, interacting rules, edge cases, plausible distractors, and contexts where pattern-matching fails.
Use "Hard" when Easy/Medium feel trivial and you want to test whether you actually understand a rule versus just recognising surface patterns.