Basics. The Causative: Have Something Done
The Causative: Have Something Done
When we arrange for someone else to do a task for us, or when something happens to us that is out of our control, we use the causative structure have something done (or get something done). For example, instead of saying "I cut my hair" (which means you used the scissors yourself!), you should say "I had my hair cut." Similarly, you might say, "We are having the house painted."
In this challenge, you will practice forming the causative structure across various tenses, including the past simple, present perfect, present continuous, and future forms. You will help secret agents write mission reports about stolen gadgets, assist stressed brides and party planners with their to-do lists, and even figure out how to arrange professional repairs for a spooky haunted house.
You'll work through 10 questions featuring a diverse mix of single-choice, multi-choice, drop-down, and drag-and-drop formats to test your accuracy with these tricky verb combinations.
Try the quiz to check your knowledge!
Simple Future
The term simple future, future simple or future indefinite, as applied to English, generally refers to the combination of the modal auxiliary verb will with the bare infinitive of the main verb.
Sometimes (particularly in more formal or old-fashioned English) shall is preferred to will when the subject is first person (I or we).
The auxiliary is often contracted to _ 'll_.
This construction can be used to indicate what the speaker views as facts about the future, including confident predictions:
- The sun will rise tomorrow at 6:14.
- It will rain later this week.
It may be used to describe future circumstances that are subject to some condition:
- He will go there if he can.
However English also has other ways of referring to future circumstances. For planned or scheduled actions the present progressive or simple present may be used. There is also a going-to future, common in colloquial English, which is often used to express intentions or predictions (I am going to write a book some day; I think that it is going to rain). Use of the will/shall construction when expressing intention often indicates a spontaneous decision:
- I know! I'll use this book as a door stop.
Compare I'm going to use..., which implies that the intention to do so has existed for some time.
Use of present tense rather than future constructions in condition clauses and certain other dependent clauses is described below under and. The modal verbs will and shall also have other uses besides indicating future time reference. For example:
- I will pass this exam. (often expresses determination in addition to futurity)
- You will obey me! (insistence)
- I will not do it! (negative insistence, refusal)
- At this moment I will tolerate no dissent. (strong volition)
- He hasn't eaten all day; he will be hungry now. (confident speculation about the present)
- One of his faults is that he will make trouble unnecessarily. (habit)
- Shall we get to work? (suggestion)
Future Progressive
The future progressive or future continuous combines progressive aspect with future time reference; it is formed with the auxiliary will (or shall in the first person, the bare infinitive be, and the present participle of the main verb.
It is used mainly to indicate that an event will be in progress at a particular point in the future:
- This time tomorrow I will be taking my driving test.
- I imagine we will already be eating when you arrive.
The usual restrictions apply, on the use both of the future and of the progressive: simple rather than progressive aspect is used with some stative verbs, and present rather than future constructions are used in many dependent clauses. The same construction may occur when will or shall is given one of its other uses, for example:
- He will be sitting in his study at this time. (confident speculation about the present)
Future Perfect
The future perfect combines aspect with future time reference.
It consists of the auxiliary will (or sometimes shall in the first person, as above), the bare infinitive have, and the past participle of the main verb.
It indicates an action that is to be completed sometime prior to a future time of perspective, or an ongoing action continuing up to a future time of perspective (compare uses of the present perfect above).
- I shall have finished my essay by Thursday.
- When I finally search him he will have disposed of the evidence.
- By next year we will have lived in this house for half a century.
For the use of the present tense rather than future constructions in certain dependent clauses.
The same construction may occur when will or shall is given one of its other meanings; for example:
- He will have had his tea by now. (confident speculation about the present)
- You will have completed this task by the time I return, is that understood? (giving instruction)
Future Perfect Progressive
The future perfect progressive or future perfect continuous combines perfect progressive aspect with future time reference.
It is formed by combining the auxiliary will (or sometimes shall, as above), the bare infinitive have, the past participle been, and the present participle of the main verb.
Uses of the future perfect progressive are analogous to those of the present perfect progressive, except that the point of reference is in the future. For example:
- He will be very tired because he will have been working all morning.
- By 6 o'clock we will have been drinking for ten hours.
For the use of present tense in place of future constructions in certain dependent clauses.
The same construction may occur when the auxiliary (usually will) has one of its other meanings, particularly expressing a confident assumption about the present:
- No chance of finding him sober now; he*'ll have been drinking* all day.
Infinitive
Regarding English, the term infinitive is traditionally applied to the unmarked form of the verb when it forms a non-finite verb, whether or not introduced by the particle to.
Hence sit and to sit, as used in the following sentences, would each be considered an infinitive:
- I can sit here all day.
- I want to sit on the other chair.
The form without to is called the bare infinitive; the form introduced by to is called the full infinitive or to-infinitive.
The other non-finite verb forms in English are the gerund or present participle (the -ing form), and the past participle – these are not considered infinitives.
Moreover, the unmarked form of the verb is not considered an infinitive when it is forms a finite verb: like a present indicative ("I sit every day"), subjunctive ("I suggest that he sit"), or imperative ("Sit down!"). (For some irregular verbs the form of the infinitive coincides additionally with that of the past tense and/or past participle, like in the case of put.)
Certain auxiliary verbs are defective in that they do not have infinitives (or any other non-finite forms).
This applies to the modal verbs (can, must, etc.), as well as certain related auxiliaries like the had of had better and the used of used to. (Periphrases can be employed instead in some cases, like (to) be able to for can, and (to) have to for must.) It also applies to the auxiliary do, like used in questions, negatives and emphasis like described under do-support. Infinitives are negated by simply preceding them with not.
Of course the verb do when forming a main verb can appear in the infinitive. However, the auxiliary verbs have (used to form the perfect) and be (used to form the passive voice and continuous aspect) both commonly appear in the infinitive: "I should have finished by now"; "It's thought to have been a burial site"; "Let him be released"; "I hope to be working tomorrow."
Perfect Infinitive
There are nonfinite constructions that are marked for perfect, progressive or perfect progressive aspect, using the infinitives, participles or gerunds of the appropriate auxiliaries. The meanings are as would be expected for the respective aspects: perfect for prior occurrence, progressive for ongoing occurrence at a particular time. (Passive voice can also be marked in nonfinite constructions – with infinitives, gerunds and present participles – in the expected way: (to) be eaten, being eaten, having been eaten, etc.)
Examples of nonfinite constructions marked for the various aspects are given below.
Bare infinitive:
- You should have left earlier. (perfect infinitive; for similar constructions and their meanings see modal verbs)
- She might be revising. (progressive; refers to an ongoing action at this moment)
- He must have been working hard. (perfect progressive; i.e. I assume he has been working hard)
To-infinitive:
- He is said to have resigned. (perfect infinitive)
- I expect to be sitting here this time tomorrow. (progressive)
- He claims to have been working here for ten weeks. (perfect progressive)
Present participle:
- Having written the letter, she went to bed. (perfect)
- The man having left, we began to talk. (perfect, in a nominative absolute construction)
- Having been standing for several hours, they were beginning to feel tired. (perfect progressive)
Past participle:
- We have been waiting a long time. (progressive, used only as part of a perfect progressive construction)
Gerund:
- My having caught the spider impressed the others. (perfect)
- We are not proud of having been drinking all night. (perfect progressive)
Other aspectual, temporal and modal information can be marked on nonfinite verbs using periphrastic constructions. For example, a "future infinitive" can be constructed using forms such as (to) be going to eat or (to) be about to eat.
Modal Verb
English has the modal verbs can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will, would, and also (depending on classification adopted) ought (to), dare, need, had (better), used (to). These do not add -s for the third-person singular, and they do not form infinitives or participles; the only inflection they undergo is that to a certain extent could, might, should and would function as preterites (past tenses) of can, may, shall and will respectively.
A modal verb can serve as the finite verb introducing a verb catena, as in "he might have been injured then". These generally express some form of modality (possibility, obligation, etc.), although will and would (and sometimes shall and should) can serve – among their other uses – to express future time reference and conditional mood.
Object
Traditional grammar defines the object in a sentence as the entity that is acted upon by the subject. There is thus a primary distinction between subjects and objects that is understood in terms of the action expressed by the verb, e.g. Tom studies grammar—Tom is the subject and grammar is the object. Traditional theories of sentence structure divide the simple sentence into a subject and a predicate, whereby the object is taken to be part of the predicate. Many modern theories of grammar (e.g. dependency grammars), in contrast, take the object to be a verb argument like the subject, the difference between them being mainly just their prominence; the subject is ranked higher than the object and is thus more prominent.
The main verb in a clause determines whether and what objects are present. Transitive verbs require the presence of an object, whereas intransitive verbs block the appearance of an object. The term complement overlaps in meaning with object: all objects are complements, but not vice versa. The objects that verbs do and do not take is explored in detail in valency theory.
Types
Various object types are commonly acknowledged: direct, indirect, and prepositional. These object types are illustrated in the following table:
| Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Direct object | Entity acted upon | Sam fed the dogs. |
| Indirect object | Entity indirectly affected by the action | She sent him a present. |
| Prepositional object | Object introduced by a preposition | She is waiting for Lucy. |
The descriptions "entity acted upon" and "entity indirectly affected by the action" are merely loose orientation points. Beyond basic examples such as those provided in the table, these orientation points are not much helpful when the goal is to determine whether a given object should be viewed as direct or indirect. One rule of thumb for English, however, is that an indirect object is not present unless a direct object is also present. A prepositional object is one that is introduced by a preposition. Despite the difficulties with the traditional nomenclature, the terms direct object and indirect object are widespread.
The term oblique object is also employed at times, although what exactly is meant varies from author to author. Some understand it to be an umbrella term denoting all objects (direct, indirect, and prepositional), whereas others use the term to denote just a prepositional object.
Syntactic Category
While the typical object is a pronoun, noun, or noun phrase, objects can also appear as other syntactic categories, as illustrated in the following table:
| Category | Example |
|---|---|
| Noun (phrase) or pronoun | The girl ate fruit. |
| that-clause | We remembered that we had to bring something. |
| Bare clause | We remembered we had to bring something. |
| for-clause | We were waiting for him to explain. |
| Interrogative clause | They asked what had happened. |
| Free relative clause | I heard what you heard. |
| Gerund (phrase or clause) | He stopped asking questions. |
| to-infinitive | Sam attempted to leave. |
| Cataphoric it | I believe it that she said that. |
Identification
A number of criteria can be employed for identifying objects, e.g: The object follows the subject. Languages vary significantly with respect to these criteria. The first criterion identifies objects reliably most of the time in English, e.g.
Fred gave me a book.
- a. A book was given (to) me. — Passive sentence identifies a book as an object in the starting sentence.
- b. I was given a book. — Passive sentence identifies me as an object in the starting sentence.
The second criterion is also a reliable criterion for isolating languages such as English, since the relatively strict word order of English usually positions the object after the verb(s) in declarative sentences.
The third criterion is less applicable to English, though, since English lacks morphological case, exceptions being the personal pronouns (I/me, we/us, he/him, she/her, they/them).
Verb Classes
Verbs can be classified according to the number and/or type of objects that they do or do not take. The following table provides an overview of some of the various verb classes:
| Transitive verbs | Number of objects | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Monotransitive | One object | I fed the dog. |
| Ditransitive | Two objects | You lent me a lawnmower. |
| Tritransitive | Three objects | They sold me bananas for two dollars. |
| Intransitive verbs | Semantic role of subject | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Unaccusative | Patient | The man stumbled twice, The roof collapsed. |
| Unergative | Agent | He works in the morning, They lie often. |
Ergative and object-deletion verbs can be transitive or intransitive, as indicated in the following table:
| Transitive | Example |
|---|---|
| Ergative | The submarine sank the freighter. |
| Object deletion | We have already eaten dinner. |
| Intransitive | Example |
|---|---|
| Ergative | The freighter sank. |
| Object deletion | We have already eaten. |
The distinction drawn here between ergative and object-deletion verbs is based on the role of the subject. The object of a transitive ergative verb is the subject of the corresponding intransitive ergative verb. With object-deletion verbs, in contrast, the subject is consistent regardless of whether an object is or is not present.
Participle
Participles are verb forms that do double duty — they help build tenses and voices, but they also work as adjectives and adverbs. Understanding both types of participles is essential for forming correct verb tenses, using the passive voice, and writing more sophisticated sentences.
The Two Participles
English has two participles:
- Present participle — formed by adding -ing to the base verb: doing, running, sleeping. It's identical in form to the gerund, but serves a different function (more on that below).
- Past participle — for regular verbs, it's the -ed form (walked, boiled). For irregular verbs, it varies widely: done, written, sung, gone.
How the Present Participle Is Used
- Progressive tenses: She is reading a book.
- As an adjective: The woman sitting by the window is my boss.
- As an adverb: Looking up from his phone, he noticed the bus had arrived.
- In absolute constructions (with its own subject): The weather being terrible, we cancelled the trip.
Present participles used as adjectives carry an active meaning — an exciting movie is one that excites you.
How the Past Participle Is Used
- Perfect tenses: They have finished the project.
- Passive voice: The email was sent this morning.
- As an adjective: The broken window needs replacing.
- Adverbially: Exhausted from the hike, we fell asleep immediately.
Past participles used as adjectives usually carry a passive meaning — the attached file is one that has been attached. However, past participles of intransitive verbs can have active meaning: fallen leaves (leaves that have fallen).
Participle vs. Gerund
Both the present participle and the gerund end in -ing, but they do different jobs. The participle acts as an adjective or adverb; the gerund acts as a noun.
- ✅ Swimming in the lake, she felt completely free. (participle — describes she)
- ✅ Swimming is her favourite hobby. (gerund — subject of the sentence)
The famous example Flying planes can be dangerous is ambiguous: flying could be a gerund ("the activity of flying planes") or a participle ("planes that fly").
Self-check: If you can replace the -ing word with a noun like "it" or "the activity," it's a gerund. If it describes a noun or tells you more about an action, it's a participle.
Watch Out: Past Tense vs. Past Participle
For regular verbs, the past tense and past participle look the same (walked, played). For many irregular verbs, they differ:
- ✅ I went home early. (past tense)
- ✅ I have gone home early. (past participle)
- ❌ I should have went home early.
If you're unsure, check whether the verb follows a helping word like have, has, or had — if it does, you need the past participle form.
Ready to practise? Try Gerund vs. Participle: Understanding -ing Word Functions, Participle Clauses: Shortening Sentences with -ing and Having + Past Participle, or Participle vs Gerund.
Simple Past
The simple past, past simple or past indefinite, sometimes called the preterite, is the basic form of the past tense in Modern English. It is used principally to describe events in the past, although it also has some other uses. Regular English verbs form the simple past in -ed; however there are a few hundred irregular verbs with different forms.
The term "simple" is used to distinguish the syntactical construction whose basic form uses the plain past tense alone, from other past tense constructions which use auxiliaries in combination with participles, such as the past perfect and past progressive.
Formation
Regular verbs form the simple past end*-ed*; however there are a few hundred irregular verbs with different forms. For details see.
Most verbs have a single form of the simple past, independent of the person or number of the subject (there is no addition of -s for the third person singular as in the simple present).
However, the copula verb be has two past tense forms: was for the first and third persons singular, and were in other instances.
The form were can also be used in place of was in conditional clauses and the like; for information on this, see subjunctive.
This is the only case in modern English where a distinction in form is made between the indicative and subjunctive moods in the past tense.
Questions, other clauses requiring inversion, negations with not, and emphatic forms of the simple past use the auxiliary did.
A full list of forms is given below, using the (regular) verb help as an example:
- Basic simple past:
- I/you/he/she/it/we/they helped
- Expanded (emphatic) simple past:
- I/you/he/she/it/we/they did help
- Question form:
- Did I/you/he/she/it/we/they help?
- Negative:
- I/you/he/she/it/we/they did not (didn't) help
- Negative question:
- Did I/you/he/she/it/we/they not help? / Didn't I/you/he/she/it/we/they help?
Usage
The simple past is used for a single event (or sequence of such events) in the past, and also for past habitual action:
- He took the money and ran.
- I visited them every day for a year.
It can also refer to a past state:
- I knew how to fight even as a child.
For action that was ongoing at the time referred to, the past progressive is generally used instead (e.g. I was cooking). The same can apply to states, if temporary (e.g. the ball was lying on the sidewalk), but some stative verbs do not generally use the progressive aspect at all, and in these cases the simple past is used even for a temporary state:
- The dog was in its kennel.
However, with verbs of sensing, it is common in such circumstances to use could see in place of saw, could hear in place of heard, etc.
- I felt cold.
If one action interrupts another, then it is usual for the interrupted (ongoing) action to be expressed with the past progressive, and the action that interrupted it to be in the simple past:
- Your mother called while you were cooking.
The simple past is often close in meaning to the present perfect.
The simple past is used when the event happened at a particular time in the past, or during a period which ended in the past (i.e. a period that does not last up until the present time).
This time frame may be explicitly stated, or implicit in the context (for example the past tense is often used when describing a sequence of past events).
- I was born in 1980.
- We turned the oven off two minutes ago.
- I came home at 6 o'clock.
- When did they get married?
- We wrote two letters this morning.
- She placed the letter on the table, sighed, and left the house.Contrast these examples with those given at.
Note also that for past actions that occurred before the relevant past time frame, the past perfect is used.
Various compound constructions exist for denoting past habitual action.
The sentence When I was young, I played football every Saturday might alternatively be phrased using used to (... I used to play ...) or using would (... I would play...).
The simple past also has some uses in which it does not refer to a past time.
- If he walked faster, he would get home earlier.
- I wish I knew what his name was.
These are generally in condition clauses and some other dependent clauses referring to hypothetical circumstances, as well as certain expressions of wish:
- He said he wanted to go on the slide.
Past Progressive
The past progressive or past continuous construction combines progressive aspect with past tense, and is formed using the past tense of be (was or were) with the present participle of the main verb.
It indicates an action that was ongoing at the past time being considered:
- At three o'clock yesterday, I was working in the garden. For stative verbs that do not use the progressive aspect, the simple past is used instead (At three o'clock yesterday we were in the garden).
The past progressive is often used to denote an action that was interrupted by an event, or for two actions taking place in parallel:
- While I was washing the dishes, I heard a loud noise.
- While you were washing the dishes, Sue was walking the dog.(Interrupted actions in the past can also sometimes be denoted using the past perfect progressive.)
The past progressive can also be used to refer to past action that occurred over a range of time and is viewed as an ongoing situation:
- I was working in the garden all day yesterday. That could also be expressed using the simple past, as I worked..., which implies that the action is viewed as a unitary event (although the effective meaning is not very different).
Past Perfect
The past perfect, sometimes called the pluperfect, combines past tense with perfect aspect; it is formed by combining had (the past tense of the auxiliary have) with the past participle of the main verb.
It is used when referring to an event that took place prior to the time frame being considered.
This time frame may be stated explicitly, as a stated time or the time of another past action:
- We had finished the job by 2 o'clock.
- He had already left when we arrived.
The time frame may also be understood implicitly from the previous or later context:
- I was eating ... I had invited Jim to the meal but he was unable to attend. (i.e. I invited him before I started eating)
- I had lost my way. (i.e. this happened prior to the time of the past events I am describing or am about to describe)
Compare He had left when we arrived (where his leaving preceded our arrival), with the form with the simple past, He left when we arrived (where his leaving was concurrent with or shortly after our arrival).
Note that unlike the present perfect, the past perfect can readily be used with an adverb specifying a past time frame for the occurrence.
For example, while it is incorrect to say I have done it last Friday (the use of last Friday, specifying the past time, would require the simple past rather than the present perfect), there is no such objection to a sentence like "I had done it the previous Friday".
The past perfect can also be used for states or repeated occurrences pertaining over a period up to a time in the past, particularly in stating "for how long" or since when". However, if the state is temporary and the verb can be used in the progressive aspect, the past perfect progressive would normally be used instead. Some examples with the plain past perfect:
- I had lived in that house for 10 years.
- The children had been in their room since lunchtime.
Past Perfect Progressive
The past perfect progressive or past perfect continuous (also known as the pluperfect progressive or pluperfect continuous) combines perfect progressive aspect with past tense.
It is formed by combining had (the past tense of auxiliary have), been (the past participle of be), and the present participle of the main verb.
Uses of the past perfect progressive are analogous to those of the present perfect progressive, except that the point of reference is in the past.
For example:
- I was tired because I had been running.
- By yesterday morning they had already been working for twelve hours.
- Among the witnesses was John Smith, who had been staying at the hotel since July 10.
This form is sometimes used for actions in the past that were interrupted by some event (compare the use of the past progressive as given above).
For example:
- I had been working on my novel when she entered the room to talk to me.
This implies that I stopped working when she came in (or had already stopped a short time before); the plain past progressive (I was working...) would not necessarily carry this implication.
If the verb in question does not use the progressive aspect, then the plain past perfect is used instead.
The past perfect progressive may also have additional specific uses similar to those of the plain past perfect.
Phrase
In everyday speech, a phrase may be any group of words, often carrying a special idiomatic meaning; in this sense it is synonymous with expression. In linguistic analysis, a phrase is a group of words (or possibly a single word) that functions as a constituent in the syntax of a sentence, a single unit within a grammatical hierarchy. A phrase typically appears within a clause, but it is possible also for a phrase to be a clause or to contain a clause within it.
Simple Present
The simple present or present simple is a form that combines present tense with "simple" (neither perfect nor progressive) aspect.
In the indicative mood it consists of the base form of the verb, or the -s form when the subject is third-person singular (the verb be uses the forms am, is, are). However, with non-auxiliary verbs it also has a periphrastic form consisting of do (or third-person singular does) with the bare infinitive of the main verb — this form is used in questions (and other clauses requiring inversion and negations, and sometimes for emphasis.
The principal uses of the simple present are given below.
To refer to an action or event that takes place habitually. Such uses are often accompanied by frequency adverbs and adverbial phrases such as always, often, from time to time and never.
Examples:
- I always take a shower.
- He writes for a living.
This contrasts with the present progressive, which is used for actions taking place at the present moment.
With stative verbs in senses that do not use progressive aspect, to refer to a present or general state, whether temporary, permanent or habitual. (In senses that do use progressive aspect, the present simple is used when the state is permanent or habitual.)
- You are happy.
- I know what to do.
- Denmark lies to the north of Germany.
When quoting someone or something, even if the words were spoken in the (usually very recent) past:
- The label says "External use only".
- Mary says she's ready.
To refer to a single completed action, as in recounting the events of a story in the present tense (see historical present), and in such contexts as newspaper headlines, where it replaces the present perfect:
- In Hamlet, Ophelia drowns in a stream.
- 40-year-old wins gold medal.
Sometimes to refer to an arranged future event, usually with a reference to time:
- We leave for Berlin tomorrow at 1 pm.
In providing a commentary on events as they occur, or in describing some theoretical sequence of events:
- I chop the chives and add them to the mixture.
- According to the manager's new idea, I welcome the guests and you give the presentation.
In many dependent clauses referring to the future, particularly condition clauses, clauses expressing place and time, and many relative clauses (see below):
- If he finds your sweets, he will eat them.
- We will report as soon as we receive any information.
In certain situations in a temporal adverbial clause, rather than the present progressive:
- We can see the light improving as we speak.
In colloquial English it is common to use can see, can hear for the present tense of see, hear, etc., and have got for the present tense of have (denoting possession.
See have got and can see below.
For the present subjunctive, see subjunctive.
For uses of modal verbs (which may be regarded as instances of the simple present) see modal verbs.
Present progressive
The present progressive or present continuous form combines present tense with progressive aspect. It thus refers to an action or event conceived of as having limited duration, taking place at the present time. It consists of a form of the simple present of be together with the present participle of the main verb and the ending -ing.
- We are cooking dinner now.
This often contrasts with the simple present, which expresses repeated or habitual action (We cook dinner every day). However, sometimes the present continuous is used with always, generally to express annoyance about a habitual action:
- You are always making a mess in the study.
Certain stative verbs do not use the progressive aspect, so the present simple is used instead in those cases. The present progressive can be used to refer to a planned future event:
- We are tidying the attic tomorrow.
It also appears with future reference in many condition and time clauses and other dependent clauses:
- If he*'s sleeping* when you arrive, wake him up.
- I will finish the job while the children are playing.
It can also refer to something taking place not necessarily at the time of speaking, but at the time currently under consideration, in the case of a story or narrative being told in the present tense (as mentioned above under present simple):
- The king and queen are conversing when Hamlet enters. For the possibility of a present subjunctive progressive, see English subjunctive.
Present Perfect
The present perfect (traditionally called simply the perfect) combines present tense with perfect aspect, denoting the present state of an action's being completed, that is, that the action took place before the present time. (It is thus often close in meaning to the simple past tense, although the two are not usually interchangeable.) It is formed with the present tense of the auxiliary have (namely have or has) and the past participle of the main verb.
The choice of present perfect or past tense depends on the frame of reference (period or point in time) in which the event is conceived as occurring. If the frame of reference extends to the present time, the present perfect is used. For example:
- I have written a letter this morning. (if it is still the morning)
- He has produced ten plays. (if he is still alive and professionally active)
- They have never traveled abroad. (if they are still alive and considered capable of traveling)
If the frame of reference is a time in the past, or a period that ended in the past, the past tense is used instead. For example:
- I wrote a letter this morning (it is now afternoon);
- He produced ten plays (he is now dead or his career is considered over, or a particular past time period is being referred to);
- They never traveled abroad (similarly).
See Simple past for more examples.
The simple past is generally used when the occurrence has a specific past time frame – either explicitly stated (*I wrote a book in 1995; *the water boiled a minute ago), or implied by the context (for example, in the narration of a sequence of events). It is therefore normally incorrect to write a sentence like I have written a novel yesterday; the present perfect cannot be used with an expression of past time such as yesterday.
With already or yet, traditional usage calls for the present perfect: ''Have you eaten yet? Yes, I've already eaten.* However, current informal American speech tends to use the simple past: *Did you eat yet? Yes, I ate already.''
Use of the present perfect often draws attention to the present consequences of the past action or event, as opposed to its actual occurrence. The sentence she has come probably means she is here now, while the simple past she came does not. The sentence, "Have you been to the fair?" suggests that the fair is still going on, while the sentence, "Did you go to the fair?" could mean that the fair is over. (See also been and gone below.) Some more examples:
- I have eaten. (implies that I'm no longer hungry)
- We have made the dinner. (implies that the dinner is now ready to eat)
- The weather has gotten cloudier. (implies that it is now more cloudy than previously)
It may also refer to an ongoing state or habitual action, particularly in saying for how long, or since when, something is the case. For example:
- I have lived in Paris for five years.
- He has held the record since he won his Olympic gold.
- We have eaten breakfast together every morning since our honeymoon.
This implies that I still live in Paris, that he still holds the record and that we still eat together every morning (although the first sentence may also refer to some unspecified past period of five years).
When the circumstance is temporary, the present perfect progressive is often appropriate in such sentences (see below); however, if the verb is one that does not use the progressive aspect, the basic present perfect is used in that case too:
- Amy has been on the swing for ten minutes.
The present perfect may refer to a habitual circumstance, or a circumstance being part of a theoretical or story narrative being given in the present tense (provided the circumstance is of an event's having taken place previously):
- Whenever I get home, John has usually already arrived.
- According to the plan, the speeches have already been given when the cake is brought out.
The present perfect may also be used with future reference, instead of the future perfect, in those dependent clauses where future occurrence is denoted by present tense. For example:
- When you have written it, show it to me.
Present Perfect Progressive
The present perfect progressive (or present perfect continuous) construction combines some of this perfect progressive aspect with present tense.
It is formed with the present tense of have (have or has), the past participle of be (been), and the present participle of the main verb and the ending "-ing"
This construction is used for ongoing action in the past that continues right up to the present or has recently finished:
- I have been writing this paper all morning.
- Why are his eyes red? He has been crying.
It is frequently used when stating for how long, or since when, something is the case:
- She has been working here since 1997.
- How long have you been sitting there?
- They have been arguing about it for two weeks.
In these sentences the actions are still continuing, but it is the past portion of them that is being considered, and so the perfect aspect is used. (A sentence without perfect aspect, such as I am sitting here for three hours, implies an intention to perform the action for that length of time.)
With stative verbs that are not used in the progressive, and for situations that are considered permanent, the present perfect (nonprogressive) is used instead.
Verb
A verb is a word that expresses an action, a state, or an occurrence — and it's the engine of every English sentence. Understanding how verbs work is foundational to everything else in English grammar, from forming questions to building complex sentences.
Verb Forms
Most English verbs have five inflected forms:
- Base form (go, write, climb) — used as an infinitive, imperative, present subjunctive, and present indicative in all persons except third-person singular.
- -s form (goes, writes, climbs) — used for the present tense, third-person singular (she writes).
- Past tense (went, wrote, climbed) — also called the preterite.
- Past participle (gone, written, climbed) — identical to the past tense for regular verbs, but often different for irregular verbs.
- -ing form (going, writing, climbing) — serves as the present participle and gerund.
The verb be is a special case with more forms than any other English verb (am, is, are, was, were, been, being). Modal verbs like can, must, and should have fewer forms than typical verbs.
Main Verbs and Auxiliaries
Verbs in English often appear in combinations: one or more auxiliary verbs paired with a main verb.
- The dog was barking very loudly.
- My hat has been cleaned.
- Jane does not really like us.
The first verb in the combination is the finite verb (it carries tense and agrees with the subject). The rest are nonfinite (infinitives or participles). Notice that these verbs don't always sit next to each other — as in does not really like.
Tense, Aspect, and Mood
English expresses tense (time reference), aspect (how an action unfolds over time), and mood (the speaker's attitude toward the action) mostly through verb combinations rather than word endings. That's why you'll encounter labels like "present progressive" or "conditional perfect" — these are specific tense–aspect–mood combinations built with auxiliaries.
Self-check: If you can change the time of a sentence by swapping one word (She runs → She ran), that word is the verb.
Keep Practising
To build your verb skills from the ground up, try these challenges: Basics. "To be" in Present Tense, Basics. Common Uses of Auxiliary Verbs, and Transitive and Intransitive Verbs.
Active and Passive Voice
The active voice (where the verb's subject is understood to denote the doer, or agent), of the denoted action) is the unmarked voice in English.
To form the passive voice (where the subject denotes the undergoer, or patient), of the action), a periphrastic construction is used.
In the canonical form of the passive, a form of the auxiliary verb be (or sometimes get) is used, together with the past participle of the lexical verb. Passive voice can be expressed in combination together with tenses, aspects and moods, by means of appropriate marking of the auxiliary (which for this purpose is not a stative verb, i.e. it has progressive forms available).
For example:
- This room is tidied regularly. (simple present passive)
- It had already been accepted. (past perfect passive)
- Dinner is being cooked right now. (present progressive passive)
The passive forms of certain of the combinations involving the progressive aspect are quite rare; these include the present perfect progressive (it has been being written), past perfect progressive (it had been being written), future progressive (it will be being written), future perfect progressive (it will have been being written), conditional progressive (it would be being written) and conditional perfect progressive (it would have been being written). Because of the awkwardness of these constructions, they may be paraphrased, for example using the expression in the process of (it has been in the process of being written, it will be in the process of being written, and similar).
The uses of these various passive forms are analogous to those of the corresponding tense–aspect–mood combinations in the active voice.
Present
Present tense is used, in principle, to refer to circumstances that exist at the present time (or over a period that includes the present time) and general truths. However the same forms are quite often also used to refer to future circumstances, as in "He's coming tomorrow" (hence this tense is sometimes referred to as present-future or nonpast). For certain grammatical contexts where the present tense is the standard way to refer to the future, e.g., conditional sentences and dependent clauses. It is also possible for the present tense to be used when referring to no particular real time (as when telling a story), or when recounting past events (the historical present, particularly common in headline language). The present perfect intrinsically refers to past events, although it can be considered to denote primarily the resulting present situation rather than the events themselves.
The present tense has two moods, indicative and subjunctive; when no mood is specified, it is often the indicative that is meant. In a present indicative construction, the finite verb appears in its base form, or in its -s form if its subject is third-person singular. (The verb be has the forms am, is, are, while the modal verbs do not add -s for third-person singular.)
Past
Past tense forms express circumstances existing at some time in the past, although they also have certain uses in referring to hypothetical situations (as in some conditional sentences, dependent clauses and expressions of wish). They are formed using the finite verb in its preterite (simple past) form.
Certain uses of the past tense may be referred to as subjunctives; however the only distinction in verb conjugation between the past indicative and past subjunctive is the possible use of were in the subjunctive in place of was.
Note also that in certain contexts past events are reported using the present perfect.
Future
English is sometimes described as having a future tense, although since future time is not specifically expressed by verb inflection, some grammarians identify only two tenses (present or present-future, and past). The English "future" usually refers to a periphrastic form involving the auxiliary verb will (or sometimes shall when used with a first-person subject). There also exist other ways of referring to future circumstances, including the going to construction, and the use of present tense forms. For particular grammatical contexts where the present tense substitutes for the future, see conditional sentences and dependent clauses. For discussion and comparison of the various ways of making future reference in English, see going-to future.
For specific uses of future constructions formed with will/shall, see future.
Future-in-the-past
A "future-in-the-past" tense (or form) is sometimes referred to. This takes essentially the same form as the conditional, that is, it is made using the auxiliary would (or sometimes should in the first person).
This form has a future-in-the-past meaning in sentences such as She knew that she would win the game. Here the sentence as a whole refers to some particular past time, but would win refers to a time in the future relative to that past time.
Perfect
The perfect aspect is used to denote the circumstance of an action's being complete at a certain time. It is expressed using a form of the auxiliary verb have (appropriately conjugated for tense etc.) together with the past participle of the main verb: She has eaten it; We had left; When will you have finished?
Perfect forms can also be used to refer to states or habitual actions, even if not complete, if the focus is on the time period before the point of reference (We had lived there for five years). If such a circumstance is temporary, the perfect is often combined with progressive aspect.
The implications of the present perfect (that something occurred prior to the present moment) are similar to those of the simple past, although the two forms are generally not used interchangeably – the simple past is used when the time frame of reference is in the past, while the present perfect is used when it extends to the present.
For all uses of specific perfect constructions, see the sections on the present perfect, past perfect, future perfect and conditional perfect.
By using nonfinite forms of the auxiliary have, perfect aspect can also be marked on infinitives (as in should have left and expect to have finished working), and on participles and gerunds (as in having seen the doctor).
Note that while all of the constructions referred to here are commonly referred to as perfect (based on their grammatical form), some of them, particularly nonpresent and nonfinite instances, might not be considered truly expressive of the perfect aspect. This applies particularly when the perfect infinitive is used together with modal verbs: for example, he could not have been a genius might be considered (based on its meaning) to be a past tense of he cannot/could not be a genius; such forms are considered true perfect forms by some linguists but not others.
Perfect Progressive
The perfect and progressive (continuous) aspects can be combined, usually in referring to the completed portion of a continuing action or temporary state: I have been working for eight hours. Here a form of the verb have (denoting the perfect) is used together with been (the past participle of be, denoting the progressive) and the present participle of the main verb.
In the case of the stative verbs, which do not use progressive aspect, the plain perfect form is normally used in place of the perfect progressive: I've been here for half an hour (not I've been being here...).
Progressive
The progressive or continuous aspect is used to denote a temporary action or state that began at a previous time and continues into the present time (or other time of reference). It is expressed using a form of the auxiliary verb to be (conjugated appropriately for tense etc.) together with the present participle (-ing form) of the main verb: I am reading; Were you shouting?; He will be sitting over there.
Certain stative verbs make limited use of progressive aspect. Their nonprogressive forms (simple or nonprogressive perfect constructions) are used in many situations even when expressing a temporary state.
The main types are described below.
- The copular verb to be does not normally use progressive forms (I am happy, not I am being happy). However its progressive aspect is used in appropriate situations when the verb expresses the passive voice (We are being followed), and when it has the meaning of "behave" or "act as" (You are being very naughty; He's being a pest).
- The verb to have does not use progressive forms when it expresses possession), broadly understood (I have a brother, not I'm having a brother), but it does use them in its active meanings (I'm having a party; She's having a baby; He was having a problem starting his car). Other verbs expressing a state of possession or similar, such as possess, own, belong and owe, also do not normally use progressive forms.
- Verbs of mental state, sense perception and similar (know, believe, want, think, see, hear, need, etc.) are generally used without progressive aspect, although some of them can be used in the progressive to imply an ongoing, often temporary situation (I am feeling lonely), or an activity (I am thinking about a problem).
- Verbs denoting positional state normally do use the progressive if the state is temporary: He is standing in the corner. (Compare permanent state: London stands on the banks of the Thames.)
Perfect Progressive
The perfect and progressive (continuous) aspects can be combined, usually in referring to the completed portion of a continuing action or temporary state: I have been working for eight hours. Here a form of the verb have (denoting the perfect) is used together with been (the past participle of be, denoting the progressive) and the present participle of the main verb.
In the case of the stative verbs, which do not use progressive aspect, the plain perfect form is normally used in place of the perfect progressive: I've been here for half an hour (not I've been being here...).
Word Order
The primary word orders that are of interest are
- the constituent order of a clause, namely the relative order of subject, object, and verb;
- the order of modifiers (adjectives, numerals, demonstratives, possessives, and adjuncts) in a noun phrase;
- the order of adverbials.
Constituent word order is defined in terms of a finite verb (V) in combination with two arguments, namely the subject (S), and object (O).
There is a difference between grammatical word order and natural word order. In many languages, topicalization and questions can change the grammatical word order.
Examples
A: [Kate loves who/Who does Kate love?] (SVO/OSV)
B: [She loves Mark/Mark is who she loves.] (SVO/OSV)
In the (A) sentences, the first one is used when putting emphasis on who Kate loves, and the second is used with more of a quizzical tone. English uses stress and tone to emphasize different aspects of the sentences, which can also change the word order, as shown above.
In the (B) sentences, the first one is more likely to be used by a native English speaker. The second sentence is grammatical as well, but less likely to be said in natural speech. This is because English uses the SVO structure in regular sentences, but is able to answer questions using the same structure that was used in the sentence.
In English, you can change the word order depending on what you want to emphasize.
B1 | Intermediate
B1 is the intermediate level of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). It marks the point where you move beyond survival English and start expressing yourself with real independence — describing experiences, explaining opinions, and handling everyday situations without a script.
What a B1 user can do
At this level, you're expected to:
- Understand the main points of clear, standard speech and writing on familiar topics — work, school, travel, hobbies.
- Handle most travel situations in English-speaking environments.
- Produce simple connected text on topics you know or care about.
- Describe experiences, events, hopes, and plans, and give brief reasons and explanations for your opinions.
- Communicate in routine tasks that require a straightforward exchange of information.
What B1 grammar looks like
B1 is where grammar starts to get more layered. You're not just forming basic sentences anymore — you're combining ideas, using different tenses with more precision, and starting to handle structures like the passive voice, modal verbs for necessity and possibility, and gerunds vs. infinitives. You're also expected to build complex sentences with linking words and dependent clauses.
Typical B1 grammar areas include:
- Future tenses — distinguishing will, going to, and the present continuous for future plans
- Passive voice — The report was written yesterday.
- Modal verbs — You should apply early. / She might be late.
- Used to — I used to live in Berlin.
- Verb patterns — knowing whether a verb takes a gerund, an infinitive, or both (I enjoy reading vs. I decided to leave)
What B1 doesn't mean
B1 speakers still hesitate, make grammatical errors, and sometimes struggle with less familiar topics. That's normal. The key difference from A2 is that you can keep a conversation going and get your point across even when things aren't perfect. The step up to B2 involves handling more abstract topics, understanding nuance, and producing more complex, accurate language.
Self-check: Can you tell a friend about a recent trip — what happened, what you liked, and what you'd do differently — without switching to your native language? If yes, you're likely operating at B1 or above.
Ready to find out where you stand? Try Are you B1/Intermediate? Test your English CEFR Level to figure out!, then build your skills with challenges like Basics. Passive Voice, Basics. Modal verbs, and Used to.
Difficulty: Medium
Medium difficulty. Difficulty levels represent author's opinion about how hard a question or challenge is.