80%
Select the correct construction.
When I was younger, I _________________________ regularly go to the gym.

For an action in the past, we need to use would followed by an infinitive (go). We cannot use use to in the affirmative form.

To ChallengesPreviousNext

Modal verb

  • She can swim. — ❌ She can to swim. (modal + bare infinitive, no to)
  • You must leave now. — strong obligation
  • It might rain. — possibility (~50%)
  • He should apologise. — advice/recommendation

Modal verbs (can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will, would) are auxiliaries expressing ability, permission, possibility, obligation, or speculation. Always + bare infinitive. Never inflected (she can, not she cans).

Rule: modals never take to after them, never add -s for third person, and can't combine directly (must can ❌ — use must be able to).

Habitual aspect

  • I walk to work every day. — present simple (current habit)
  • I used to smoke. — past habit, no longer true
  • Every summer we would go to the lake. — repeated past action
  • I would live in Paris. — wrong (would for habitual needs an action, not a state)

The habitual aspect marks actions as repeated/routine: present simple (now), used to (past, stopped), would (past repeated actions within a time frame).

Rule: used to works for both states and actions. Would works only for repeated actions — never states (I used to know him ✅, not I would know him ❌).

C1 | Advanced

  • Not only did she finish early, but she also helped others. — inversion for emphasis
  • It is the process that matters, not the result. — cleft sentence
  • I insist that he be present. — formal subjunctive
  • Were I to disagree, I would say so. — inverted conditional

These are C1 structures — the CEFR advanced level. At C1 you control inversion, cleft sentences, subjunctive forms, and register-switching fluently across formal and informal contexts.

Marker: if you can restructure a sentence for rhetorical effect without hesitation, you're C1.

Hard

  • Had she not intervened, the situation would have escalated. — inverted conditional
  • All distractors are grammatically plausible in other contexts
  • Multiple rules interact (e.g., tense + aspect + modality)
  • Context determines the answer — no single "rule" is enough

Hard marks upper-intermediate to advanced challenges: B2+, interacting rules, edge cases, plausible distractors, and contexts where pattern-matching fails.

Use "Hard" when Easy/Medium feel trivial and you want to test whether you actually understand a rule versus just recognising surface patterns.