Help the temperamental head chef complete his dramatic kitchen instructions by dragging the correct words into the blanks.
I am trusting you with my life's work. Honestly, were you to reveal the secret sauce recipe to our rivals, I would banish you from this kitchen forever!
I am trusting you with my life's work. Honestly, were you to reveal the secret sauce recipe to our rivals, I would banish you from this kitchen forever!
To make a second conditional more formal, we can drop "if" and use the inversion "were + subject + to + infinitive" (were you to reveal).
"If" doesn't work here because it would require the full verb phrase (if you were to reveal). "Should" doesn't work because it is followed by a bare infinitive, not an infinitive with "to" (should you reveal).
Since this is a second (unreal) conditional, the result clause requires "would" + base verb (would banish).
Conditional sentence
- ✅ If you heat ice, it melts. — zero conditional (always true)
- ✅ If it rains, I*'ll** take an umbrella.* — first conditional (real future)
- ✅ If I had wings, I would fly. — second conditional (unreal present)
- ✅ If I had left earlier, I would have caught the train. — third conditional (unreal past)
Conditional sentences pair an if-clause with a consequence. Five patterns (zero through mixed) each combine specific tenses to express different levels of reality and time.
Pattern: the tense in the if-clause is always one step "back" from what you'd expect — past for present hypotheticals, past perfect for past hypotheticals.
Inversion
- ✅ Has Sam read it? — question inversion (basic)
- ✅ Rarely have I seen such talent. — fronted negative (advanced)
- ✅ Not only does she sing, she also writes. — correlative inversion
- ✅ Had I known, I would have acted. — inverted conditional (no if)
Inversion = subject and auxiliary swap places. Basic: all English questions. Advanced: fronted negatives/restrictives (Rarely…, Not only…, Never…) and formal conditionals without if.
Pattern: put a negative/restrictive adverb at the front → invert subject and auxiliary. This is a C1+ rhetorical device for emphasis.
Verb mood
- Indicative: She goes every day. — stating fact
- Imperative: Go now. — giving command
- Subjunctive: I suggest she go. — hypothetical/recommendation
- Conditional: She would go if asked. — dependent on condition
Verb mood marks the speaker's attitude: indicative (fact), imperative (command), subjunctive (unreal/recommended), conditional (would/could). English barely marks mood morphologically — mostly through auxiliaries and word order.
Rule: stating a fact? → indicative. Giving a command? → imperative. Imagining/recommending? → subjunctive or conditional. The mood determines which verb forms and auxiliaries you use.
Subjunctive mood
- ✅ If I were you… — past subjunctive (not was)
- ✅ I suggest that he go. — present subjunctive (not goes)
- ✅ It's important that she be present. — present subjunctive
- ❌ If I was you… — common in speech, avoided in formal writing
The subjunctive uses bare-infinitive forms (go, be) after verbs of demand/suggestion, and were (not was) in unreal/hypothetical conditions. Two contexts: that-clauses (I insist that he leave) and if-clauses (If she were here).
Rule: after suggest/recommend/demand/insist that… → use base form. In if + unreal condition → use were for all persons.
Infinitive
- ✅ I want to go. — to-infinitive after want
- ✅ She can swim. — bare infinitive after modal
- ✅ Let me help. — bare infinitive after let
- ❌ I enjoy to read. — wrong (enjoy takes gerund, not infinitive)
The infinitive has two forms: to-infinitive (to go) after verbs like want, decide, plan, hope; bare infinitive (go) after modals and causatives (let, make, help).
Rule: after want, need, decide, plan, hope, expect, agree, refuse → to-infinitive. After can, will, must, let, make → bare infinitive. After enjoy, avoid, finish → gerund, NOT infinitive.
B2 | Upper Intermediate
- ✅ If I had studied harder, I would have passed. — third conditional
- ✅ The report is being reviewed by the committee. — passive progressive
- ✅ Having finished the exam, she left. — participle clause
- ✅ He denied having taken the money. — complex verb pattern
These are B2 patterns — the CEFR upper-intermediate level. At B2 you handle mixed conditionals, all passive forms, participle clauses, and can argue a point clearly. This is the level most universities and employers require.
Marker: if you can write a structured essay and debate an abstract topic, you're B2.
Hard
- Had she not intervened, the situation would have escalated. — inverted conditional
- All distractors are grammatically plausible in other contexts
- Multiple rules interact (e.g., tense + aspect + modality)
- Context determines the answer — no single "rule" is enough
Hard marks upper-intermediate to advanced challenges: B2+, interacting rules, edge cases, plausible distractors, and contexts where pattern-matching fails.
Use "Hard" when Easy/Medium feel trivial and you want to test whether you actually understand a rule versus just recognising surface patterns.