Basics. Conditional Inversion: Had, Were, and Should: correct answers
Jump to answers ↓Conditional Inversion: Had, Were, and Should
In advanced and formal English, conditional sentences can be formed without using the word if. Instead, we drop if and invert the subject and the auxiliary verb. For example, instead of saying "If I had known the answer," you can say "Had I known the answer." Similarly, "If you should need help" becomes "Should you need help," and "If the manager were to find out" becomes "Were the manager to find out."
This challenge will test your ability to construct and recognize these advanced conditional structures through a series of fun and dramatic scenarios. You'll help a time traveler fix a ruined timeline, advise a clumsy spy, and warn an employee about bringing a pet iguana to the office. Along the way, you will practice using had for past unreal situations (third conditional), were for present or future unlikely events (second conditional), and should for possible future situations (first conditional).
You'll work through 10 questions featuring a mix of single-choice, multi-choice, drop-down, and drag-and-drop formats.
Try the quiz to check your knowledge!
Correct answers
Question 1
The correct answers are Were aliens to land, If aliens were to land, and If aliens landed.
This is a second conditional sentence (unreal present/future), indicated by "would be required" in the main clause.
To express a highly unlikely hypothetical event, we can use "if + subject + simple past" (If aliens landed) or "if + subject + were to + base verb" (If aliens were to land).
For a more formal, literary tone, we can drop "if" and invert the subject and "were" (Were aliens to land).
"Had aliens landed" is incorrect because it is a third conditional form, which mismatches the main clause.
Question 2
Help the mischievous employee weigh the risks of bringing a pet iguana to the office.
_____ about Sir Scales-a-Lot, I would surely be fired on the spot!
The correct answer is Were the manager to find out.
This sentence uses second conditional inversion to describe an unlikely hypothetical situation in the present/future.
Instead of saying "If the manager were to find out," we can drop if and invert the subject and verb: "Were the manager to find out." We must use the subjunctive were for all subjects in this structure, making "Was the manager to find out" incorrect. "Did" and "Had" do not fit this specific hypothetical were to construction.
Question 3
Help the temperamental head chef complete his dramatic kitchen instructions by choosing the correct word for each blank.
I am trusting you with my life's work. Honestly, were you to reveal the secret sauce recipe to our rivals, I would banish you from this kitchen forever!
I am trusting you with my life's work. Honestly, were you to reveal the secret sauce recipe to our rivals, I would banish you from this kitchen forever!
To make a second conditional more formal, we can drop "if" and use the inversion "were + subject + to + infinitive" (were you to reveal).
"If" doesn't work here because it would require the full verb phrase (if you were to reveal). "Should" doesn't work because it is followed by a bare infinitive, not an infinitive with "to" (should you reveal).
Since this is a second (unreal) conditional, the result clause requires "would" + base verb (would banish).
Question 4
Complete the spy director's final warning to the rather clumsy Agent 007.5.
_____ by the evil Dr. Chaos, press the red button on your explosive bowtie immediately.
The correct answer is Should you be cornered.
This sentence is a variation of the first conditional, pairing an "if" clause with an imperative command ("press the red button").
When we want to make a future condition sound slightly less likely, we can use "should." By dropping if and inverting the subject and auxiliary verb, "If you should be cornered" becomes "Should you be cornered."
"Had you been cornered" is third conditional (past), and "Were you be" is grammatically invalid.
Question 5
Should you
This is an inverted first conditional. It means "If you should turn..." or "If you turn...". We know it must be "Should" because the verb "turn" is in the base form. "Had you" would require the past participle ("turned"), and "Were you" would require an infinitive ("to turn").
had you not ignored
This is an inverted third conditional functioning inside a mixed conditional sentence (past action, present result). It means "If you had not ignored..." We know it refers to the past because the eyebrow is already gone, making the condition a past regret!
Question 6
The correct answers are Should the new espresso machine break, If the new espresso machine breaks, and If the new espresso machine should break.
This is a first conditional sentence. We can use the present simple (If the new espresso machine breaks) or add "should" to make the condition seem slightly less likely (If the new espresso machine should break).
We can also invert the sentence by dropping "if" and moving "should" to the front (Should the new espresso machine break).
"Should the new espresso machine breaks" is incorrect because "should" is a modal verb, so it must be followed by the base form of the verb (break), without an "s".
Question 7
Complete the time traveler's frantic diary entry by choosing the correct phrase for each blank.
The timeline is completely ruined! Furthermore, had I not forgotten my emergency repair manual, I could have fixed the portal by now.
The timeline is completely ruined! Furthermore, had I not forgotten my emergency repair manual, I could have fixed the portal by now.
In third conditional sentences, we can drop "if" and invert the subject and the auxiliary verb "had" (Had I known...).
For negative sentences, the "not" must separate from the auxiliary verb and come after the subject (Had I not forgotten...). Using the contraction (Hadn't I...) is grammatically incorrect in standard conditional inversion.
Because this is an unreal past condition with a present/past result, the result clause requires a modal perfect like "could have" to match the past participle "fixed."
Question 8
The correct answers are Had we not lost, If we had not lost, and If we hadn't lost.
This is a third conditional sentence describing an unreal past situation.
You can use the standard "if" clause (If we had not lost / If we hadn't lost).
You can also invert the subject and auxiliary verb to sound more formal (Had we not lost).
However, in inverted negative conditionals, the word "not" must follow the subject. Contracted negative inversions like "Hadn't we lost" are grammatically incorrect!
Question 9
Had the burglar not sneezed
This is an inverted third conditional (past unreal). It means "If the burglar had not sneezed." We drop "if" and put the auxiliary verb "had" before the subject. "Did" and "has" cannot be used to form this conditional.
were the alarm system
This is an inverted second conditional (present/future unreal). It means "If the alarm system were..." In formal English, we use "were" (not "was") for all subjects when inverting a second conditional.
Question 10
Complete the polar explorer's dramatic memoir.
_____ the sudden blizzard, we would have safely reached the summit by noon.
The correct answer is Had it not been for.
This is a third conditional sentence describing an unreal past situation ("would have reached"). To invert a negative third conditional phrase like "If it had not been for," we drop if and move the auxiliary verb had before the subject it.
The negative word not remains after the subject. Therefore, "Had it not been for" is the only grammatically correct choice. "Were it not for" and "If it were not for" refer to the present or future (second conditional).