"Go" is the correct answer because it is used to form the subjunctive mood in the past.
Option "am going" is incorrect because it is in the present continuous form, which is used to describe an action that is currently in progress or scheduled to happen in the near future.
Option "would go" is incorrect because it is in the conditional form, which is used to describe an action that would happen in certain conditions or in the future.
Option "had gone" is incorrect because it is in the past perfect form, which is used to describe an action that was completed before another action or point in time in the past. Here it doesn't indicate that the action was completed before anything else.
Past tense
Simple past vs past perfect: simple past puts events on the main timeline (I arrived. She left.). Past perfect marks an event as earlier than another past event (She had left before I arrived). If all events are in sequence, simple past is enough. Only use past perfect when you need to show "earlier than the main story."
The past tense has four forms encoding different temporal relationships: simple past, past progressive, past perfect, past perfect progressive.
Diagnostic: are events in sequence? → simple past is fine. Need to show one event happened before another past event? → past perfect for the earlier one.
Subjunctive mood
Subjunctive vs indicative: indicative states facts (He goes every day). Subjunctive marks unreality (I suggest he go; If I were you). The subjunctive drops the -s and insists on were — signalling "this isn't (or may not be) real." In informal speech it's disappearing, but formal/academic writing still expects it.
The subjunctive mood = hypothetical/counterfactual marker. Present subjunctive (base form after suggest/demand/insist that). Past subjunctive (were in unreal conditionals).
Diagnostic: is the clause about something unreal, demanded, or recommended (not yet true)? → subjunctive. Is it factual? → indicative.
C1 | Advanced
C1 vs C2: C1 means fluent and flexible use with occasional gaps in very unfamiliar domains. C2 means native-like command of idiom, irony, and register across any subject. If you can handle advanced grammar but still miss cultural nuance or very rare idioms, you're C1.
C1 is the advanced CEFR level: inversion, cleft sentences, subjunctive mood, advanced conditionals, and precise register control in professional and academic contexts.
Diagnostic: can you write persuasively in different registers and catch subtle irony? Consistently → C2. Sometimes → C1.
C2 | Proficiency
C2 vs C1: C1 is fluent and effective but occasionally reaches for words or misses cultural nuance. C2 is indistinguishable from a well-read native speaker — idiom, irony, register-switching all land naturally. Most learners never need C2; knowing it exists prevents over-ambition.
C2 is the highest CEFR level: full mastery of idiom, irony, allusion, and rhetorical control across all registers and subjects.
Diagnostic: could your writing pass as a native speaker's in any context — journalism, academia, comedy, legal? Yes → C2. Almost → still C1.
Hard
Hard vs Medium: Medium tests one rule with realistic distractors. Hard tests interacting rules, edge cases, or context-dependent answers where multiple options seem correct until you think deeply. If you're scoring 80%+ on Medium, try Hard to find your real gaps.
The Hard tag filters for B2+ challenges with layered difficulty: rule interactions, subtle distractors, and contexts that demand genuine grammatical reasoning.
Diagnostic: if Hard questions feel impossible, drop to Medium and master the individual rules first. Hard assumes you already know each rule — it tests whether you can apply them together.