58%

Help the detective complete her formal report on the great penguin heist by dragging the correct prepositional phrases to their matching clauses.

The exact extent to which the zookeeper was involved remains a heavily guarded secret. Furthermore, the absurd premise on which the entire heist was based makes absolutely no logical sense. Finally, the highly suspicious manner in which the penguin vanished suggests a mastermind at work.

The exact extent to which the zookeeper was involved remains a heavily guarded secret.

We use "to which" because the standard phrase is "the extent to something."

Furthermore, the absurd premise on which the entire heist was based makes absolutely no logical sense.

We use "on which" because we "base something on a premise."

Finally, the highly suspicious manner in which the penguin vanished suggests a mastermind at work.

We use "in which" because things happen "in a certain manner."

To ChallengesPreviousNext

Relative clause

  • The man who called is my uncle. — restrictive (essential: which man?)
  • My uncle, who lives in Paris, called. — non-restrictive (extra info, commas)
  • My uncle that lives in Paris — wrong (that can't introduce non-restrictive)
  • The book that I read = The book I read — restrictive (pronoun optional)

Relative clauses modify nouns using who/whom/whose/which/that or where/when/why. Restrictive = essential, no commas, that OK. Non-restrictive = extra, needs commas, uses which/who (never that).

Rule: if you can remove the clause and still know which noun is meant → non-restrictive (commas). If removing it makes the noun ambiguous → restrictive (no commas).

Preposition

  • interested in — ❌ interested on
  • good at football — ❌ good in football
  • depend on — ❌ depend of
  • arrive at the station — ❌ arrive to the station

Prepositions link nouns to the rest of the sentence: time (at 5pm), place (in London), manner (with care), abstract (afraid of). Most are idiomatic — the "correct" preposition must be memorised with each verb/adjective combination.

Rule: there is no universal rule. English prepositions are learned by combination: interested IN, good AT, depend ON, afraid OF. Your native language's equivalent will often mislead.

Complex sentence

  • Because I overslept, I missed the bus. — dependent clause (reason) + independent
  • The man who called is my uncle. — relative clause inside the sentence
  • If it rains, we'll stay inside. — conditional dependent + independent
  • Because I overslept. — fragment (dependent clause alone)

A complex sentence pairs an independent clause with one or more dependent clauses linked by subordinating conjunctions (because, although, if, when) or relative pronouns (who, which, that).

Pattern: independent clause = the main point. Dependent clause = the background, reason, or condition. Move the dependent clause around for emphasis.

Clause

  • I missed the bus. — ✅ independent clause (stands alone)
  • Because I overslept. — ❌ fragment (dependent clause, can't stand alone)
  • Because I overslept, I missed the bus. — ✅ dependent + independent = complete sentence
  • I missed the bus, and I was late. — ✅ two independent clauses joined by and

A clause is a unit built around a verb with a subject. Independent = can stand alone. Dependent = needs an independent clause to complete it.

Test: does the group of words have a subject + verb AND can it be a sentence on its own? Yes → independent clause. Has a subject + verb but feels incomplete → dependent clause.

Collocations

  • make a decision — ❌ do a decision
  • strong coffee — ❌ powerful coffee
  • heavy rain — ❌ strong rain
  • highly unlikely — ❌ very unlikely (grammatical, but less natural)

Collocations are word pairs that English habitually puts together. Both options may be grammatically valid, but one sounds native and the other doesn't.

Pattern: there's no logic to predict them — you make decisions but do homework, you have strong coffee but heavy rain. They must be learned as chunks, not deduced from rules.

B2 | Upper Intermediate

  • If I had studied harder, I would have passed. — third conditional
  • The report is being reviewed by the committee. — passive progressive
  • Having finished the exam, she left. — participle clause
  • He denied having taken the money. — complex verb pattern

These are B2 patterns — the CEFR upper-intermediate level. At B2 you handle mixed conditionals, all passive forms, participle clauses, and can argue a point clearly. This is the level most universities and employers require.

Marker: if you can write a structured essay and debate an abstract topic, you're B2.

Hard

  • Had she not intervened, the situation would have escalated. — inverted conditional
  • All distractors are grammatically plausible in other contexts
  • Multiple rules interact (e.g., tense + aspect + modality)
  • Context determines the answer — no single "rule" is enough

Hard marks upper-intermediate to advanced challenges: B2+, interacting rules, edge cases, plausible distractors, and contexts where pattern-matching fails.

Use "Hard" when Easy/Medium feel trivial and you want to test whether you actually understand a rule versus just recognising surface patterns.