The correct answers are: Supposing the chef catches us, what exactly is our escape plan? Assuming we bypass the laser grid, we still have to crack the parmesan safe. Even if we get the recipe, no one will ever believe we pulled this off.
Supposing and assuming are excellent C1-level conjunctions for setting up hypothetical scenarios. Even if correctly introduces a condition that does not change the main clause's outcome.
The sentence starting with Unless is incorrect because "unless" already means "if not," making "unless we don't" a confusing double negative.
The sentence starting with Provided is grammatically correct but logically flawed; we use "provided (that)" for desired conditions or requirements, not for disasters like being attacked by dogs!
Conjunction
- ✅ I was tired, but I stayed. — coordinating (links two equal clauses)
- ✅ I stayed because I was needed. — subordinating (introduces dependent clause)
- ✅ Although it rained, we went out. — subordinating (front position)
- ❌ I was tired, because. — incomplete (subordinating conjunction needs a clause after it)
Conjunctions connect words, phrases, or clauses. Coordinating (and, but, or, so, yet, for, nor) join equals; subordinating (because, although, if, when, while) introduce dependent clauses.
Pattern: coordinating = equal partners, same grammatical weight. Subordinating = one clause depends on the other for its meaning.
Conditional sentence
- ✅ If you heat ice, it melts. — zero conditional (always true)
- ✅ If it rains, I*'ll** take an umbrella.* — first conditional (real future)
- ✅ If I had wings, I would fly. — second conditional (unreal present)
- ✅ If I had left earlier, I would have caught the train. — third conditional (unreal past)
Conditional sentences pair an if-clause with a consequence. Five patterns (zero through mixed) each combine specific tenses to express different levels of reality and time.
Pattern: the tense in the if-clause is always one step "back" from what you'd expect — past for present hypotheticals, past perfect for past hypotheticals.
Negation
- ✅ I don't see anything. — ❌ I don't see nothing. (double negative in standard English)
- ✅ She never goes out. — never already negates (no doesn't needed)
- ✅ He doesn't like coffee. — do-support for negation
- ✅ Nobody came. — negative subject (no auxiliary needed)
Negation uses not after an auxiliary/modal, or do-support when there's no auxiliary. One negative per clause in standard English — never, nobody, nothing already negate without adding not.
Rule: one negative element per clause. I don't see anything or I see nothing — never both together in standard English.
Complex sentence
- ✅ Because I overslept, I missed the bus. — dependent clause (reason) + independent
- ✅ The man who called is my uncle. — relative clause inside the sentence
- ✅ If it rains, we'll stay inside. — conditional dependent + independent
- ❌ Because I overslept. — fragment (dependent clause alone)
A complex sentence pairs an independent clause with one or more dependent clauses linked by subordinating conjunctions (because, although, if, when) or relative pronouns (who, which, that).
Pattern: independent clause = the main point. Dependent clause = the background, reason, or condition. Move the dependent clause around for emphasis.
C1 | Advanced
- ✅ Not only did she finish early, but she also helped others. — inversion for emphasis
- ✅ It is the process that matters, not the result. — cleft sentence
- ✅ I insist that he be present. — formal subjunctive
- ✅ Were I to disagree, I would say so. — inverted conditional
These are C1 structures — the CEFR advanced level. At C1 you control inversion, cleft sentences, subjunctive forms, and register-switching fluently across formal and informal contexts.
Marker: if you can restructure a sentence for rhetorical effect without hesitation, you're C1.
Hard
- Had she not intervened, the situation would have escalated. — inverted conditional
- All distractors are grammatically plausible in other contexts
- Multiple rules interact (e.g., tense + aspect + modality)
- Context determines the answer — no single "rule" is enough
Hard marks upper-intermediate to advanced challenges: B2+, interacting rules, edge cases, plausible distractors, and contexts where pattern-matching fails.
Use "Hard" when Easy/Medium feel trivial and you want to test whether you actually understand a rule versus just recognising surface patterns.